[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Security CodeSecurity Code
Type Code

The Objective Measure of Our General Welfare(5-23-15)

Measuring our General Welfare objectively is the second oldest moral and economic question. But to measure the General Welfare we must first answer the oldest question, "What do each of us life forms use to measure what is good and bad for each of us?, or " How do any of we life forms measure our own personal value?". For should this personal measure be the same for all of us life forms, then we can aggregate and total the sum of the these common individual values into a measure of the General Welfare.

Further, and more importantly, it gives each of us a moral guide as to how to treat other life forms = No First Cost. We each try to maximize our own time alive, so this implies we have a moral duty to maximize all time alive. Since we must eat other life forms to stay alive, this duty leads to conundrums like how to deal with our conservation debt.

For scientists this objective measure of value must serve as the premise for a real GUT theory. By inspection, a theory is created by one or more of we life forms to explain how things work back to all of us; so it must begin and end with how we each basically organize information, own time cost minimization.

YOU use as little time as possible to get WHATEVER YOU NEED TO STAY ALIVE OR WANT. The reason is simple, we all only have one unit of time alive per unit time as measured by the speed of light in a body.

We use our time alive in our life form, i.e. one unit of time alive per unit time as measured by the speed of light = c in our body. Of necessity we unconsciously try to spend as little time of our time alive as possible to get what we want or need to stay alive. For good reason, when we take to long to get what we need to stay alive = we are dead. Any of you reading this don't like staying alive? e.g. Money saves us time. A money exchange is meant to save both sides of the exchange their time.

Objective = Any observation/measurement that any two or more of us can agree we can see with our properly operating sensory apparatus. It takes at least two of us to create an 'objective' fact. i.e. Each observer can see, rap the fact with their knuckles. In short, an objective facts are created a society.

Logically, when every life form uses the same objective measure of personal value, then we can aggregate this common to all measure into the Objective Measure of our General Welfare when all of us are considered equal = our time alive both as an individual and summed as the General Welfare. Thus living longer is good.

In a conserved universe, we are then asking, "How do we cost one another in trying to stay alive?". This means "What rule of morality must we practice towards others to maximize the General Welfare?" = don't deliberately cost another equal their time(money) without honest compensation.

The rule of morality in a self-aware society can only be No First Cost.

The rest of this paper explains the how and why of our measure of personal value and how it generalizes to 'The Objective Measure of Our General Welfare.

11-20-09 In 1985 I discovered what 'Objective Measure of Personal Value' all life forms use to keep themselves alive. This is the oldest 'economic question of all, "What do we each use to measure what is good and bad for ourselves under all possible sets of physical circumstances?".

It is 'our time alive'. We all unconsciously minimize time we spend to get what we need to stay alive. We are all own time cost minimizers.

02-28-10 Objective Value must take this logical form to measured: 1 unit of x(what we value) per unit time, where time is measured by c, the speed of light. Personal value, after all, depends upon being alive to experience value.

(01-10-10)When all life forms use the same personal measure of value, then we can discover the "Objective Cost Measure of the General Welfare".

(05-09-11) It is: Cost as measured by what? "Other peoples time alive.", not yours = No First Cost.

Since you most visibly live by exchange(you do use money don't you?), then you treat other people like you would like to be treated and they will do the same for you.

Below I will describe what it is, how we use it, how I discovered what our "measure of personal value is", and some implications.

Right now almost of of us use this measure unconsciously. Unconscious gets you and us dead.

What is this measure of personal value?

Actually it is a measure of personal cost = a fixed input(income) we spend to obtain what we value. It is the same cost measure for all life forms, your time alive, and we all only have one unit of time alive per unit time = 24 hours a day per day to obtain the necessities for life.

Ergo, we try to spend as little time alive as possible to obtain whatever it is we need to stay alive. That's because when we take to long, we die.

We are unconscious "own time cost minimizers".

1-30-2009 The answer to the original First Question on Front Page was; "Why won't our leaders ever ask this question: "How Do Our/my Actions COST OTHERS/you?".

Since we so very visibly live by exchange(XC) = use money; then how our actions costs others time is the the question we must ask in order to to be fair to others and maximize the common good. Yet this question, "How do my actions cost other equal persons their time?", is of course, the one question our leaders never ask. That is because they do not want to e held accountable for taking others time without compensation. With no objective measure of value they get away with stealing from us.

8-12-2008 rev. This "objective" measure of the common good arises directly from my refutation of "Coase's Theorem. 4-22-08 Coase's Theorem, Politics, and Scientific Publication Which led in turn to another implication: How we use this 'objective measure of value" implied what conserved geometry our universe must be based upon for us to be alive = a Moebius Strip Geometry.

"Objective" means we each can confirm that we can perceive this measure with our normal sensory apparatus,i.e. rap it with your knuckles directly or by seeing a 'gauge' move.

The common good means that this "measure of value" must be the same thing for each of us. In short, it must be how you, probably unconsciously now, measure what is good and bad for yourself by comparing the 'time costs to yourself' of alternative courses of action.

1-12-09 Once we agree upon what our in common 'objective personal value measure' is, then that directly implies a public 'moral standard' for judging how anyone's behavior affects the survival of all. Most of us do not like that idea. It impinges on our freedom of action. However, when you live on a planet where our individual actions must affect others for good or ill, then knowing what this Objective Measure of Value is and applying it to our own actions, is absolutely necessary for our planet's survival.

When all life forms(people) use the same measure for personal good and bad,it means we can aggregate and sum up all the individual goods into an objective measure of the common good = an Objective Measure of the General Welfare.

How do I prove this to someone?

Since 1985, I have shown at least 35,000 people what this measure is in person, face to face, plus many hundreds of thousands on the radio. I started doing this after publication of may article on Coase was blocked by an anonymous referee, despite my Professors saying I was right. So I started publishing anyway as the duty of a scientist is to publish after you make a discovery. By 1990, I started to hear my words come back to me over the radio and TV = cost minimization.

So after getting someone to agree that this 'objective, rap it with your knuckles' measure must be the one thing common to everything they do, I would ask; "What is the one thing common to everything you do? Three people out of the 35,000 got it right.

So I would ask, "What do you see when you look in the mirror in the morning?". Usually with a little nudge, they would admit that they saw themselves, their body, their life form. Ergo, your life form is the one objective, rap it with your knuckles, thing common to everything you do.

Next, I would ask, "How many hours a day do you have alive in your body?"
"Why, 24 hours" they would answer.
"How about the bug on the floor if it should live so long"; "The same."
"And the E-T in the Andromeda galaxy?"; "The same."

So then I would ask, "That means you have one unit of time alive per unit time?; "Yes."

Then I would say, "So the real question is, How do we use(spend) our time alive to get what we need to say alive, isn't it?" "Yes."

Then I would whisper in their ear, "We try to use as little time as possible, don't we; because when we take to long, we die." "Yes."

So your own personal objective measure of value is, of course, your life form. A life form is objective, we both can rap it with out knuckles. Your life form is common to everything you do until death. And every life form in the universe has the same amount of time alive per day = 24 Earth hours, if they should live so long.
i.e. One unit of time alive per unit time as measured by the speed of light. Notice I just plugged us into e = mc^ (c^ = c squared).

Right now, almost everyone on Earth is an UNCONSCIOUS Own Time Cost Minimizer. You all know what staying unconscious gets you. Dead! Wake up, smell the roses, we have a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter coming due. I do know that almost all of you want to stay alive.

8-12-2008 How Did I Figure This Out and What Does It Mean For Doing Science?

The beginning is the best place to start. Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize in Economics in 1991 for asking this simple question in "The Problem of Social Cost" Journal of Law & Economics, October 1960, "Who should society make pay for causing a cost to another person's person or property?" He made clear that each person owned their property 100%. He pointed out that there were two possible ways society could enforce Liability for a cost by anyone upon another's 'property or person'.

It turns out that his question and showing why he was mistaken directly implied what and how this Objective Measure of the Common Good worked. Coase by his assumptions constructed a conserved but growing 'universe' that required, by construction, that you must use a piece of the universe as a fixed measure all other possible variables were compared. As we will see this was a crucial assumption by Coase and explains his wonderful error = 'wrong' prediction.

Coase gave a great example: A Cattleman and Wheat farmer who lived next to each other. The CM cattle trampled or ate some of the farmers wheat. Somebody was going to bear the cost of the lost wheat, the only real question from societies point of view is' "Who do we make pay for causing the cost?". Coase pointed out there were two ways to assign Liability; Strict Liability = CM pays for the damage his cattle causes, OR No Liability = the WF pays the CM not to damage him in the future. Golly, that sounds exactly like the legal definition of extortion.

BUT, when Coase compared the Q of G&S XCed of the two alternative ways of assigning liability, he found there was no difference. Crime had no cost. Our corporations loved his answer. Now they could bribe legislators to change the laws to let them sell Not Hurting People = Not Polluting.

It took me eight years to find his procedural error = an example of the Fallacy of Non-Attribution explained in Why Coase's Theorem is Wrong, Politics, and Scientific Publication.

Once I figured out Coase, I asked "How must we work for this result to be true?"

The most important thing it implied for us right now is: We have a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter that must be dealt with for us to reap the fruits of self-awareness.

Posted by admin Saturday, July 12, 2008 (22:30:30)
[ Administration ]

"The Objective Measure of Our General Welfare(5-23-15)" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: The Objective Measure of Our General Welfare(6-23-13) (Score: 1 )
by rickstr on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 (07:14:03)
(User Info | Send a Message)
If you think about this carefully - that all it really makes sense. The question that I have not tried nikoglda evaluate themselves so clearly and drive into the framework of formulas. Leaving much of me to madness. Though now owning it - it's a good chance to reconsider my attitude towards rationalization.

craigslist search

Related Links [x]

Article Rating [x]
Average Score: 4.58
Votes: 12

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good

Options [x]

Disconnect Links [x]
This URL is for those of you who deny the E-Ts existence.

Disclosure Project has 500 govt witnesses who swore before Congress to their direct E-T contacts.

This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.

Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.

Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program

Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?

Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.

These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.

How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024?

9-21-12 How to find the 2 conjunction asteroids in the "Missing Earth" crop circle?

This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.

Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center

Crop Circle Connector

2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's

HOW can we get these tests DONE?

Contact Congress

The Latest Changes Made To Site

Seeing Ourselves [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Forums Last posts [x]
Last 10 Forum Messages

Equation for fixed # orbits A-M debt planets have.
Last post by Dan in Stopping Our Anti-Matter conservation debt from striking the Sun July 16, 2024 on Jan 31, 2018 at 21:57:48

N1CL Stipulated Gross Revenues(SGR), what & how?
Last post by Dan in N1CL Earmarks, SGRs, How Paid, Mechanics, etc. on Jan 29, 2018 at 02:43:03

Why is N1CL a LLC? How allocate SGRs? How pay for FTL?.
Last post by Dan in N1CL Earmarks, SGRs, How Paid, Mechanics, etc. on Jan 29, 2018 at 00:40:52

Great opportunity for honest salesmen. Top commissions.
Last post by Dan in N1CL Heip Wanted on Jan 23, 2018 at 05:25:33

2-22-18 add. ToDos for N1CL programmers and etc..
Last post by Dan in Stopping Our Anti-Matter conservation debt from striking the Sun July 16, 2024 on Jan 17, 2018 at 15:17:14

“Nullius in verba,” Latin for “Take nobody’s word for it.”
Last post by Dan in Stopping Our Anti-Matter conservation debt from striking the Sun July 16, 2024 on Dec 24, 2017 at 04:00:44

"The hardest thing to see is yourself."
Last post by Dan in Stopping Our Anti-Matter conservation debt from striking the Sun July 16, 2024 on Dec 13, 2017 at 18:58:46

Should we try to prevent Earth from being vaporized?
Last post by SystemBot in Stopping Our Anti-Matter conservation debt from striking the Sun July 16, 2024 on Nov 20, 2017 at 17:21:29

ToDos for WOUs
Last post by SystemBot in To Dos suggested for N1CL on Nov 16, 2017 at 11:23:59

new thered checking
Last post by in Warnings To Public on Dec 31, 1969 at 19:00:00

Message Tree [x]
Dan: Zerohedge comment by koan Sun, 02/11/2018 - 19:12 I'll sum up the article for you; "Think for yourself" and "Question authority". You may have heard of the Descartes proposition "I think therefore I am", but it was written out in a fuller form by Antoine Léonard Thomas. dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum or in English: "I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am". Doubting makes all the difference in the World.
12-Feb-2018 00:39:00
Dan: “I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.” - Nietzsche
23-Jan-2018 10:16:47
Dan: "questioning scientific hypotheses, even scientific theories, is what all scientists should do, if true science is to advance. That is why the Royal Society’s official motto is “Nullius in verba,” Latin for “Take nobody’s word for it.” Ironically, the Society rarely practices this approach when it comes to climate change." Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris
21-Dec-2017 08:32:34
Dan: "The hardest thing to see is yourself."
13-Dec-2017 17:44:35
Dan: "Seek truth and all else follows."
06-Dec-2017 14:45:43
Dan: Back to Ishkabibble's observation that we are in fact 'one world', there is no outside unless we plan on exchanging with other E-T worlds. So the question is raised: What system of Laws do we live under? Obviously wars between nations would be prohibited. Clearly with only one worldwide market, just individuals exchange or groups of persons who freely associate to XC with anyone else worldwide. Wowsers!!! that means politicians are to protect the freedom for all free people to engage in uncoerced XC with other free people. i.e. protect the peace between us. Gee willikers, hmmm; it seems that duty has escaped at least American politicians hasn’t it? Whose fault is that in a purported democracy??? Peace between we citizens of Earth is a political choice. It is time we acted like grownups, don't you think???
02-Dec-2017 19:35:11
Dan: "Russian Insider 12-01-17 Western politicians are like schoolyard nerds who, fearing the tough kid, huddle together to look bigger. Every Russian kid knows that seeking safety in numbers is a surefire sign of a scared wimp."
02-Dec-2017 08:24:35
Dan: Russian Insider 12-01-17 "As for the EU it is “enjoying” a much-deserved irrelevance while being mostly busy absorbing wave after wave of society-destroying refugees proving, yet again, the truth of the saying that if your head is in the sand, your ass is in the air."
02-Dec-2017 08:20:39
Dan: Ishkabibble Nov 30, 2017 at 6:17 pm ALL of the individual national economies of the world must NOT depend upon exporting or importing stuff — whether that stuff is TVs or weapon systems or terrestrial resources or food. The logic of this recommendation is easier to understand if one thinks of the entire world as only ONE nation with only ONE SINGLE economy. Looking at the world in this way, if importing and exporting is vitally necessary for ANY economy (including the aforementioned macro-economy) to survive and thrive, to and from just exactly WHOM would this true macro-economy “export” and “import” — the people of Mars? No. This one-economy-world (the one we are actually living in right now) will at some point HAVE to figure out how to “go it alone”. NOT having accepted that this is necessary is IMO exactly why “the world” is going through what it is going through today. And this is why all of the individual national economies of the world should IMMEDIATELY, DELIBERATELY start “figuring out” and then implement the design of an economic system in which they “go it alone” while providing a decent standard of living for their citizens.
01-Dec-2017 12:58:01
Dan: This quote says it well from "Do Disclosures of Atrocities Change Anything?" By ALEXANDER COCKBURN Counterpunch, July 31, 1010. twitchy questions such as that asked by The Nation’s Chris Hayes on the Rachel Maddow Show: “I wonder ultimately to whom WikiLeaks ends up being accountable.” The answer to that last question was given definitively in 1851 by Robert Lowe, editorial writer for the London Times. He had been instructed by his editor to refute the claim of a government minister that if the press hoped to share the influence of statesmen, it “must also share in the responsibilities of statesmen.” “The first duty of the press,” Lowe wrote, “is to obtain the earliest and most correct intelligence of the events of the time, and instantly, by disclosing them, to make them the common property of the nation… The Press lives by disclosures… For us, with whom publicity and truth are the air and light of existence, there can be no greater disgrace than to recoil from the frank and accurate disclosure of facts as they are. We are bound to tell the truth as we find it, without fear of consequences – to lend no convenient shelter to acts of injustice and oppression, but to consign them at once to the judgment of the world.”]. I can not say this better. We seek the truth as individuals and when enough of us do in public then we become a civilized society. I know it does not have to be a majority, but it must be at least a few percent of us; then the exemplars lead us all.
12-Nov-2017 16:01:13
Message History
Only Registered Users can POST

Visitors [x]
We have received
page views since
April 27, 2005

COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent# 8566730 issued 10/22/2013
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit.
When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy