[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

[x] Quote of the Day

[x] Main Menu

Home Page

Home Operations: Learn how the N1CL News Interface creates well tested and verified Public Information for all.

Accountability is created when Anyone can question a Public Report in front of all. The No 1st Cost List lets anyone question ONLY its Full Members and those who report Yes/Nos on the public record of its interface. Thus by identifying questions, inputting clarifications, and expressing disagreements with this publicly reported info, we create the most valuable commodity of all, good public information.

Also, gladly accepting such public accountability means you can create for yourself a public reputation for reporting honest truthful 'news'. A priceless personal asset, especially for scientists, reporters, politicians & public servants, and businesses.

The heart of the N1CL News Interface are the Member & Questioner agreements and the Q&A Dialogue Procedures just below. They are simple, and treat everyone the same, especially me, the inventor. Dan Alter n1cl-1



Question & Answer(Q&A) Dialogue Procedures

Anyone can Become a Member!

Anyone can "Recommend/Not-Recommend, Warn, or Dispute Public Facts". The N1CL calls doing this a "Yes/No"!



Anyone can Question a Member's or Yes/No person's postings!

How Do Entries to N1CL Public Record Work: You have 10 minutes after submission to edit, change, or delete your entry on the N1CL Public Record; then the entry is locked. You can always add more replies to your topic, or an answer in a Q&A dialogue to clarify until the other party answers. Also you can use open to all comment forums first to improve entry.

To Ask a Question: the Questioner and 'the Member or "Yes/No" person' agree to respond in turn, until the Questioner accepts the answer, or they agree to Disagree giving reason(s); using the 'Last Response' mechanism described below.

To Forward The Q&A Dialogue; either can check the "I beg to differ with you with reason(s)" box.

There are Four Ways to End a Q&A Dialogue:

1) The Questioner can check "I accept." and say something;

2) the Questioner can Accept by Default by not replying within 36 hour;

3) EITHER on their turn, can check 'this is my last response'; to which the OTHER can Accept by checking "I accept"; Or by Not Replying within 36 hours;

4. After stating reason(s) checks "I Disagree with the Last Response".

Changing an 'acceptance by not replying in time' to an 'I disagree' must be done during next logon.

Non-Members can not be questioned on the N1CL record about their Q&A dialogues with a Member or Yes/No person; but anyone can question their "Yes/No's".

The N1CL Interface's Best Feature

The Automatic Consequence giving users the Public workload each can handle: Unless your Dialogues are current; the N1CL Interface automatically blocks you from asking or being asked a new question.

Except for 'not replying' to a 'this is my last response'; Staying Current is a reply within 36 hours after your notice e-mail is sent. The block is automatically removed when you become current. Except for larger organizations, you can block new questions at any time by stating a reason; e.g. vacation, sick.


Show Your Honesty To All By Becoming A Member

Question a Member-'No/Yes' person | Question a Member-'No/Yes' person | Apply for Betamembership





Message Tree [x]
Dan: “We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.
23-May-2014 02:30:22
Dan: Let me define a leader. He must have vision and passion and not be afraid of any problem. Instead, he should know how to defeat it. Most importantly, he must work with integrity. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam
23-Apr-2014 23:06:26
Dan: We must say that there are as many squares as there are numbers. Galileo Galilei, Itis just that by inspection there are more whole numbers that are not squares than are. A Godelian result.
15-Apr-2014 06:36:41
Dan: Measure what is measurable, and make measurable what is not so. Galileo Galilei
15-Apr-2014 06:32:06
Dan: "The more the laws the more corrupt the nation" -- Tacitus
13-Mar-2014 05:54:08
Dan: “In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be falsifiable; and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak about reality.” Karl Popper
22-Feb-2014 09:17:21
Dan: Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists." http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/12/03/yes-the-overheated-climate-crisis-debate-is-settled-so-chill-out-and-relax/2/
10-Jan-2014 00:08:28
Dan: "ANOMALOUS GRAVITATIONAL FORCE A discussion of this phenomenon appears in the 4 October 1999 issue of Newsweek magazine (See also the December 1998 issue of Scientific American.) The mystery of the tiny acceleration towards the sun in the motion of the Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11 and Ulysses spacecraft remains unexplained as of 2006. A team of planetary scientists and physicists led by John Anderson (Pioneer 10 Principal Investigator for Celestial Mechanics) has identified a tiny unexplained acceleration towards the sun in the motion of the Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, and Ulysses spacecraft. The anomalous acceleration - about 10 billion times smaller than the acceleration we feel from Earth's gravitational pull - was identified after detailed analyses of radio data from the spacecraft. A variety of possible causes were considered including: perturbations from the gravitational attraction of planets and smaller bodies in the solar system; radiation pressure, the tiny transfer of momentum when photons impact the spacecraft; general relativity; interactions between the solar wind and the spacecraft; possible corruption to the radio Doppler data; wobbles and other changes in Earth's rotation; outgassing or thermal radiation from the spacecraft; and the possible influence of non-ordinary or dark matter. After exhausting the list of explanations deemed most plausible, the researchers examined possible modification to the force of gravity as explained by Newton's law with the sun being the dominant gravitational force. "Clearly, more analysis, observation, and theoretical work are called for," the researchers concluded. The scientists expect the explanation when found will involve conventional physics. An article in http://www.space.c om/scienceastronom y/mystery_monday_0 41018.html discusses the current thinking on the acceleration anomaly." from this URL http://www.nasa.go v/centers/ames/mis sions/archive/pion eer.html#.UsqyLRDH Igo
07-Jan-2014 01:19:45
Dan: A prime purpose of the List is to prevent missing data with a permanent public record; http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/20/the-vast-majority-of-raw-data-from-old-scientific-studies-may-now-be-missing/
21-Dec-2013 08:15:05
Dan: Steve Oregon says in Watts Up With That: December 20, 2013 at 7:06 pm “Greg Laden appears to be expressing a belief, not knowledge, which is a common trait among global warming alarmists.” Dear Mr Laden, You’ve been “Peer Reviewed” It’s a new day fella. You need to be more careful . If you and your brethren are going to express yourselves you better consider how little control you have over who checks your work for accuracy. If you can’t back it better keep it to yourselves. Otherwise it ends up in the light of day and “Peer Reviewed” by people who have no allegiance to you. Now I am certain your lofty selves scoff at the notion of non-distinguished people critiquing your opinions and work but you could just tell the truth if you try harder.
21-Dec-2013 08:06:30
Message History
Only Registered Users can POST
Create/Login

Social Connect! [x]

Seeing Ourselves [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]

Forums Last posts [x]

Visitors [x]
We have received
3315960
page views since
April 27, 2005


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent# 8566730 issued 10/22/2013
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit.
When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy
includes/cmsinit.incheader.php