No1stcostlist.com › News › HowTo find the 2 conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle

User Info

Welcome Anonymous

Quote of the Day

· Vittorio Alfieri
· Rand Beers
· John N. Mitchell
· John Ruskin

read more...

Main Menu

Main Pages

Question members & Yes/No's

News

Home Operations

Front Page

Top 10

Forums & Pictures

Community Forums

Message Tree

Search Message Tree

Photo Gallery

Find Out

FAQ - Help

SiteMap

Statistics

Surveys & Archive

Surveys

Topics

Stories Archive

About Us

Our Sponsors

Content

Members options

Become Full Member

Personal

Site Registration

ScientificNewsandEvents

WorldNewsandEvents

Treasury

Coppermine Stats

coppermine

• Albums: 1
• Pictures: 3
  · Views: 1435
  · Votes: 0
  · Comments: 4

HowTo find the 2 conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle
Which two asteroids are shown in a Must Be Caused conjunction in the Longwood-Warren, aka the "Missing Earth" crop circle? There are two methods described below. By Daniel Alter n1cl-1

Why Look?

When our astronomers objectively confirm in public that the conjunction exists, then, by inspection, they also show it is unnatural and must be caused by intelligent action. This will confirm that E-Ts are trying to contact us with a public warning telling us when our conservation debt made of Anti-Matter(A-M) will strike the Sun vaporizing Earth. We can prevent it, once we know precisely when. Time is of the essence, we can not afford to be wrong about this. Everyone's life is at stake.

"objective facts" are always created by eye witnesses. For a scientist it means eyewitness reports that accurately measure reality leading to predictions about thee causes and effects of what is reported. Objective facts can and must be verified by others. Honesty is a work requirement.

There are two ways to verify which asteroids are used for the conjunctions:

1. The brute force way our astronomers can use to confirm what the ME predicts: We have fast computers and telescopes so they could look where the 100 largest asteroids are supposed to be in their orbits, find those that are not where they are supposed to be, then look where the anomalous asteroids would be for them to be in conjunction on above predicted dates. This way would verify what the ME message shows.

or 2. Use the clues provided by the structure of the 'Missing Earth" to deduce which asteroids are used: This method is described below. This still requires our astronomers to look to fing the predicted asteroids.

(There is another another benefit, the ME shows us the logical syntax and structure the E-Ts use to tie pictures that objectively/logically measure reality.)

In order to find which two asteroids are shown in conjunction in the "Missing Earth" crop circle we need to do the following: Assume = posit a basis of comparison between the "Missing Earth" crop circle and the actual solar system, then measure the predictions this comparison generates.

Base Objective Premise of Comparison: The "Missing Earth" crop circle is an exact to scale representation of our solar system out to the asteroid belt.

Working materials Margin of Error: Right now all we have are photos taken from small airplanes at some angle off vertically overhead = foreshortening in picture. See 'Methods & Materials" below for how to eliminate any material error from our Premise of Comparison. Later someone can use a 3-D rendering program to give us a centered vertically picture. I suspect our Defense Depts. have good ones from a satellite.

There are 65 asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle. Two asteroids are shown in conjunction at exactly the 9 o'clock position of our North Heliocentric view of our solar system. There are two possible conjunction dates, either on July 16, 2009 at 16:30.09 UT or exactly three sidereal Earth years later on July 16, 2012 at 10:57.52 UT.

Definition of conjunction for our purposes: When any two of the 65 asteroids intersect plane "A" at the same time on either of the two dates listed above. Plane "A" looks like a great wall that slices down through the asteroid conjunction vector that runs out from the Sun's center on Earth's ecliptic plane. i.e. A conjunction occurs even though both asteroids could literally be 100,000s of kilometers(km) apart on plane "A". e.g. One above the plane of Earth's ecliptic and one below, as long as they intersect "A" simultaneously.

How do we use the "Missing Earth" to determine which two asteroids are shown in conjunction?

1. The 65 asteroids shown in the 'Missing Earth" are all shown on the same orbital radius; yet asteroids vary by several 100 million kilometers in their orbital radii.

Our Secondary Premise: We assume the orbital radius shown is the average of the radii of the 65 asteroids = their Mean Orbital Radius(MOR).

Use this equation to find Mean Orbital Radius of 65 asteroids(MOR): Since we know Earth's orbital radius equals 1 AU(149,550,000 km), then we can deduce the MOR using the following relationship: Measure the diameter of 65 asteroids using a "Missing Earth" picture. The diameter of the asteroids in my "Missing Earth" picture measured 17.6 millimeters, while at the same time the orbital diameter of the Earth measured 7.075 millimeters. You will get an equation that looks like this, 17.6/7.075 = x/AU. Solve for x and divide by 2 to get MOR.

2. The equation the circle makers used to determine the size of the circles depicting the 65 asteroids in the 'Missing Earth" crop circle. The ME circle 65 asteroid orbital radius and diameter equation. i.e. Divide actual radius of each asteroid on either date into MOR, then multiply this percentage times actual diameter of asteroid in km to get proportional size of circle representing each asteroid in km.

Ergo, once you know one of two things, an asteroids actual orbital radius used in computing the Mean Orbital Radius of the 65 'Missing Earth" asteroids, or its actual diameter; then you can deduce which asteroid it is from the size of its the circle in the "Missing Earth".

3. Determine the constant of multiplication used to increase the size of the circles depicting the asteroids so they can be seen. I think by 10^5 = 100,000. This one is easy, each asteroid circle is some percentage of MOR in the ME picture, thus once we identify one asteroid and its circle size from the "asteroid diameter eq." defined above, then we can deduce what factor of multiplication was used. i.e. 1. Measure the circle size in the ME picture for your asteroid, divide that measurement by the MOR you measured in your picture and determine the percentage = A; 2. Divide the MOR in km into actual asteroid diameter and determine the percentage = B; 3. Solve for x: xB(km)/MOR(in km) = percentage A.

I presume the same for all the asteroid circles

Key characteristics of Longwood-Warren, i.e. "Missing Earth" crop circle.

The ME has two different dates in it, and one big difference.

First date: the concentric rings representing inner four planets orbits are for July 17, 2003 as the positions of the remaining three planets demonstrate.

Second date: the positions of the 65 asteroids shown are for July 16, 2009 or for July 16, 2012, exactly 6 or 9 sidereal years later.

The big discrepancy in ME is: the Sun is pushed nearly to Mercury's orbit, showing the net directional force of the explosion over 6 or 9 years , i.e. the difference between July 17, 2003 and July 16, 2009/2012.

These 65 asteroids shown are anomalous, in that they all lie on the same orbital radius. Actually their orbital radii vary by 100s of thousands of kilometers. Below we will see how the circle makers uses a beautifully elegant way to show actual asteroid diameter, orbital radius, and position with one circle for each asteroid and the mean of the 65 radii shown. How to see this is explained in Methods & Materials below.

Methods & Materials

Our base known unit of measure = ASTRONOMICAL UNIT (AU). 1 AU = 149597870.691 kilometers, thus all other measurements will be done in metric units.

1.We will require a list of the largest 100 main belt asteroids ranked by
diameter, see 500 largest asteroids with no TNOs.

2. Each asteroid's orbital radius on July 16, 2009 at 16:30.09 UT and on July 16, 2012 at 10:57.52 UT for exactness later. Who will do this?

3. A good blown up pic of the Missing Earth,

4. Determine the mean of the orbital radii of the 65 asteroids shown by using the ME picture this way:

First take four diameters of the ME picture measured in millimeters. Start with the long diameter of the picture, then the short diameter at a right right angle, then the two in between diameters. At the same time, measure off Earth's diameter using the outer edge of its concentric ring(same for asteroid ring).

5.Average your four measurements of both the diameters of asteroid ring and Earth. Divide by two to get radius. Since Earth's mean orbital radius = ASTRONOMICAL UNIT (AU). 1 AU = 149597870.691 kilometers , then we can solve for the mean orbital radius of the asteroid shown with this formula: AU/x = measurement of Earths mean radius from picture in millimeters/asteroid ring average radius measurement from picture. Solve for x.
My answer is approximately 371,000,000 kms.

6. Use the largest asteroid closest to the Nine o'clock position as probable largest asteroid in Missing Earth = Europhysine on July 16, 2009 and create its circle proportional to Ceres diameter as base measure, e.g. Ceres is 832 km and Europhysine is 256 km so [size=13]Europhysine circle will be 256/832 = .308 of diameter of circle representing Ceres.

I know a better way than 6. Since counting 65 asteroids down from largest or up from smallest 100 asteroids means there is a 30 asteroid overlap, then use the 2 to 4 asteroids from the thirty with the biggest differences between the sizes of the circles depicting them and then work out the rest.

Or we could use the middle asteroids in the thirty = 13, 14, 15, 16. Since these will be close in diameter, then differences in there orbital radii will dominate, generating a distinct pattern.

7. Determine the next 64 asteroids ranked in descending order of diameters,

8. Determine the proportional diameter of the circle representing each asteroid shown by using Ceres as the largest circle of the 100 as the base circle,

9. Use each asteroid's actual orbital radius and divide it into the mean of the 65 orbital radii,

10. Divide this percentage into the mean and multiply the diameter of the circle representing each asteroid, e.g. Asteroids inside the mean of the 65 orbits will have a circle larger than their actual diameter, and the ones further out will have a smaller circle representing it. See the “asteroid calculator URL,

11. Match up the sizes of the asteroid circles predicted by our equation with the sizes of Missing Earth circles. Once we have determined which two asteroids are closest to conjunction, then we can look to see if they are in their normal orbital positions. If not in expected position, we can then look at where they would be for them to have been in conjunction on July 16, 2009 or July 16, 2012.

After confirming the first conjunction is on July 16, 2009, is a second conjunction implied?

The short answer is yes. I have always felt the E-T message was incomplete, Shoemaker-Levy 9 while giving us their unit of time and showing an example of total destruction, was not put into context except by its date of impact, July 16, 1994 at 20:13 UT.

When you are explaining something you use a three step process. First, "Tell them what you are going to say." = the title of this article. Second, "Say it" by giving definitions, explaining methods and materials, giving examples. Third, Sum up what you just said with a conclusion(s) = one or better two asteroid conjunctions. Shoemaker-Levy 9 did not constitute a "Say it", although it is an example of total destruction and it denoted the circle makers unit of time.

Two Possible Verified Conjunction Outcomes

1. To confirm the first conjunction on July 16, 2009 is to confirm the second, which will almost certainly include the smallest of the 65 steroids represented. It will lie at the 6 o'clock position on July 16, 2012(or less likely the 12 o'clock). A second conjunction would be very good news, the E-Ts are being helpful which probably means more help when we ask nice in public.

At first, I thought the 12 o'clock for the second conjunction, but decided the 6 o'clock is much more probable. Explained in a November 30, 2009 [url=http://www.no1stcostlist.com/No 1st Cost List Shoutblock.html]November 30, 2009 Message Tree.[/url] Button in the header on right.

2. A July 16, 2012 conjunction means obviously no second conjunction, and that the ME circle was the "Tell them what you just said" part of the E-T message. In short, they have washed their hands of us, unless we can convince them otherwise. I like this scenario a lot less than the two conjunction hypothesis.

Conclusions:

1. Our astronomers need to start looking pronto. Now they know where to look. Once we deduce their constant of multiplication and we know the Mean Orbital Radius of the 65 asteroids; then given any date for the orbital locations of all 65 asteroids, we can deduce directly from the size of the circle used what the actual diameter of the two asteroids that are depicted in conjunction = their names.

There are only two dates and one certain location to check, the 9 o'clock of our North Heliocentric view of our solar system on July 16, 2009 at 16:30.09 UT or July 2012 at 10:57.52 UT.

Lets see who figures this out first.500 largest asteroids w. no TNOs = Trans Neptunian Objects.

2. There are only three possible results:
a. No conjunction;
b. there are two conjunctions, one on July 16, 2009 and the next on July 16, 2012 or;
c. just one "must be caused" conjunction on July 16, 2012.

No conjunction means someone was pulling our legs = sick joke. Unlikely result, but good news for us we hope, because we still have an A-M debt.

Confirming either of the two "must be caused" conjunctions possibilities means we have a big problem. I have discussed "What Must Be done" elsewhere, but I will summarize part here.

First, this is a "public warning". That implies a public response. In short our astronomers MUST verify the conjunction in public, not only on the N1CL public record, but in every other way possible. We will want E-T help. While it is conceivable we can do a disconnection with our present technology, it is unlikely we have enough time left to accomplish what must be done. I repeat, we need the E-Ts help, and given their obscure public warning, we get no help until we acknowledge their warning in public.

Why would E-Ts require a public response from us before helping?

So astronomers, lets start looking, a conserved universe eliminates fools and scaredy cats.

Posted by Dan Sunday, December 06, 2009 (08:07:34)

[ Administration ]

"HowTo find the 2 conjunction asteroids shown in the "Missing Earth" crop circle" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Top FP w. Q&A

Why BP well still has a growing leak!

Why pressure in BP well is growing at 2 psi per hour.

Implications of BP well intake pressure being over 85k psi.

Why the BP blowout may relate to our conservation debt?

'Einsteins Missed Implication' TEST Shows Relativity's Base Reference Frame

Question & Answer procedures are installed; now debugging. Front Page Version 9-21-09 to ???

The No 1st Cost List(N1CL) Public internet interface creates the only way we can peacefully eliminate the Three Monkey Society leaders that govern us now. We can not afford their lies and bad information anymore.

One thing we know for sure about anyones true statements, the facts contained within or implied are accurate.

The question becomes: How can we quickly verify the truth in what people say in public = to all of us? Only questions from anyone can expose error and lies. Doing this in front of all was impossible before the internet and cheap computer memory. Now everyone can potentially meet simultaneously to hear and question anyones public on the record assertions.

First requirement: Anyone can question and ask.

Second requirement: an agreement to answer: A list of people, businesses, governments, etc who will agree to answer questions from anyone about what they say on the N1CL public record.

Third requirement: Question & Answer Dialogue Procedures that treat both parties impartially.

Doing these creates a real public place for Earth. With the N1CL we can create accurate objective information for potentially everyone, which makes a society of equals before our Laws actually possible.

Enormous personal benefit: It is single place on Earth where you can show everyone you stand behind what you say. In short, prove your honesty to all.

The inventor speaks first. My name is Dan Alter n1cl-1, I am a scientist and I had publication of the fundamental political/economic discovery blocked, so my wife and I invented the N1CL. Why Coase's Theorem is Wrong, Politics, and Scientific Publication Since science is for all of us, that must mean anyone can question a scientist's public assertions. Now that the N1CL is invented, I assert you can not claim to be a scientist and not be a member of the N1CL.

A thought experiment leads to a Warning about a Preventable catastrophic danger to Earth.

In February 1991 I theoretically predicted that when spirits create and move life forms by splitting base molecules into plus and minus halves, they must put the Anti-Matter half on the other side/surface of our Moebius geometry universe. Eventually our conservation debt comes back striking our Sun, Kaboom. It was just a deductive thought experiment, I had no evidence of any kind.

On February 10, 1992 in a February 1, 1992 Science News article "Geometric Harvest" by Gerard Hawkins, I saw objective evidence that absolutely confirmed my theoretical prediction. It was a picture of Earth being vaporized that could only have been drawn by someones who had seen these events up close from space. Ergo, E-Ts not us. It was the first large complex crop circle, the Barbary Castle.

It was extraordinarily disconcerting. It took me three days to deduce there must be an out, a way to prevent Earth from being vaporized.

Since it can be prevented, I have been warning you ever since.

Last December after seeing Avatar, I finally realized that I was faced with a terrible ethical question. It was the answer to a question that had bothered me from the beginning about the E-T warning ritual. Their warning was absolutely minimal. "Why would they want us to die without a try?" They were life lovers too, they did business here without bothering us, yet no obvious in your face public warning?

The answer is unfortunately obvious. It was because we are a Three Monkey Society(3MS), which makes us criminally insane. Clearly with FTL, we would do to them what we did to the North and South American Indians. Given the simple means of doing faster than light(FTL) star travel, turning a 3MS loose with FTL travel would literally mean other non 3MS FTL planetary societies would be committing suicide. (Yes I can prove how the E-Ts do FTL, and it does not violate going faster than light over the surface of our Moebius Strip Geometry universe.)

My ethical duty is to save life here on Earth.
But the E-T's duty is to other living planets. Since they love life to, then only hard experience would make them choose to let a 3MS die. For sure, we would not listen to them telling us to stop being bad. We have to figure this out for ourselves.

So what can we do to show them we have stopped being a 3MS? Only an election and a public cry directly to them for help. That is the only way I see out of this dilemma.

We must have their help now, we need two working interplanetary FTL ships as it is probably too late to build them ourselves.

THEREFORE, the only way I or the E-Ts can ethically help disconnect our conservation debt made of Anti-Matter(A-M) is for Earth's citizens to show by DEED IN PUBLIC that we have ended being a Three Monkey Society. That means our leaders must start Using the N1CL right now; so we can demonstrate publicly we are not a 3MS anymore.

The second public purpose of the N1CL[/b], and arguably its biggest benefit, is to stop forevermore our sworn leaders from committing the most heinous crime possible in any democracy: When any sworn leader ignores, tolerates, covers-up, or helps any other sworn leader commit a felony.

Here's how to stop you and our elected and sworn leaders from being unconscious members of a Three Monkey Society(3MS).

Scientific background to the Warning

"Objective facts" are eyewitness measurements and observations that are confirmed by other honest reporters. Thus "Objective facts" can only be created by two or more honest people. Since science is for all of us, this must mean negative or positive public feedback from anyone who sees "logical and observational discrepancies" in any scientist's public assertions. How else can our reports and theories be confirmed, improved, or disproved?

I, Dan Alter, made a fundamental scientific discovery in 1985. What "objective" measure of value that we spirits/souls all must and do use to keep our life forms alive. Presently here on Earth, almost always unconsciously. How to measure personal value and thus the common good. We unconsciously value(logically order) any piece of information we perceive through this measure. Thus knowing consciously what it is and how we use it must serve as the 'objective' causal premise for a scientific Grand Unification Theory.

It is a measure that by construction, assumes a conserved universe: One unit of time per unit of time alive, and no take backs.

In a conserved universe, we spirits must create a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter to keep our life forms alive. The only two questions that matter now are: 'when does the debt came due?', and 'can we disconnect from it?'. The answer to doing a disconnection is, of course, yes. God always gives us a final out. Doing a disconnection means we go faster than light(FTL) to the other side of the Sun. Should my prediction of how to do FTL be true, then it is simple to do and within our technological capabilities, and certainly the E-Ts capabilities.

One of the N1CL's highest services is to Objectively Verify or Disprove warnings of danger to Earth or anybody on Earth.

Our public dialogue starts with someone asking the first question: Questions please.(As of 05-16-10 not a single question about anything I have said from a stranger in the over 5 years that the N1CL has been operational. My oh my.)

Our First Warning

"Incontrovertible Proof That E-Ts Are Contacting Earth With A Very Public Warning"

Reported by Dan Alter, n1cl-1.

I am a scientist. I have sworn to tell the truth on this public record.

I have a fearful prediction for the rest of you to confirm. At first, it was just a theoretical prediction with no objective evidence supporting it; but since 1992, a series of published scientific reports have verified every single causal link in the underlying theory, and now we there is a way to conclusively confirm the theories' ultimate conclusion.

For life to exist on a planet, we objectively real spirits must create a planetary conservation debt made of Anti-Matter(A-M) when we make our life forms move. Our spirits put our A-M debt onto the other side of our Moebius Strip Geometry Universe. Eventually a planet's conservation debt comes back to Earth striking our Sun, or it must be consciously disconnected. Our public choice.

Most present scientists deny that our life forms are driven by objectively real spirits, and they also believe that Einstein's Relativity Theory shows there is no base "frame of reference" that tie all other personal "reference frames" together. As we will see, both assertions are proven wrong when it is shown that we have an A-M conservation debt.

The crucial piece of proof that we are, in fact spirits, is that the E-Ts warning message shows exactly how our conservation debt made of Anti-Matter strikes our Sun, vaporizing Earth, leaving an Afterglow of expanding cooling gases. These afterglows were first seen by the Hubble after a 1997 Long Term Gamma Blaster(LTGB). Now we have seen many more afterglows after a LTGB occurs = vaporized life bearing planets.

The E-T public warning is a chilling four or five part message that includes two famous crop circles. The first was the "Barbary Castle" placed down on July 17, 1991 at 1:45 AM UTC that shows us how we are vaporized and the 'afterglow' that follows. It was followed exactly to the minute three years later by the Shoemaker-Levy comet that struck Jupiter on July 16, 1994(leap year) at 20:13 PM UTC. The third part of the E-T warning was the 'Missing Earth" crop circle On June 26, 1995 showing an asteroid conjunction.

The remaining parts of the E-T's warning message are one or probably two asteroid conjunction(s)' that can not occur naturally' = "must be caused by someones not from Earth". We will know which possibility after our astronomers look.

Read carefully, think, consider carefully, then act. Everyone's life depends upon our acting consciously and swiftly in public.

Predicted Conjunction(s)

When the asteroid conjunction shown in the 'Missing Earth" occurs on July 16, 2009, there will be a second conjunction on July 16, 2012 which decisively sums up the E-T's message.

Should the asteroid conjunction occur on July 16, 2012, then we will not get a second conjunction, and we will have to use other measurements to determine exactly when.

Confirming that one or both of these 'must be caused' asteroid conjunctions exists confirms that the message must be from E-Ts, since we Earthlings can not move asteroids into conjunction. Read More.

E-T Five Part Message Summary

Which two asteroids does the 'Missing Earth" show in conjunction?

Summary: Why We Have A Conservation Debt, Theory & Evidence which includes how I discovered the E-T Warning.

Here is the heart of the List, the Q&A procedures.

They are how we question and answer one another on the record. These procedures are not for cowards. Below them are the two boxes that explain how anyone can become a member or post without cost with a message to all. Read and think.

Question & Answer(Q&A) Dialogue Procedures

Anyone can Become a Member!

Anyone can "Recommend/Not-Recommend, Warn, or Dispute Public Facts". The N1CL calls doing this a "Yes/No"!

Anyone can Question a Member's or Yes/No person's postings!

How Do Entries to N1CL Public Record Work: You have 10 minutes after submission to edit, change, or delete your entry on the N1CL Public Record; then the entry is locked. You can always add more replies to your topic, or an answer in a Q&A dialogue to clarify until the other party answers. Also you can use open to all comment forums first to improve entry.

To Ask a Question: the Questioner and 'the Member or "Yes/No" person' agree to respond in turn, until the Questioner accepts the answer, or they agree to Disagree giving reason(s); using the 'Last Response' mechanism described below.

To Forward The Q&A Dialogue; either can check the "I beg to differ with you with reason(s)" box.

There are Four Ways to End a Q&A Dialogue:

1) The Questioner can check "I accept." and say something;

2) the Questioner can Accept by Default by not replying within 36 hour;

3) EITHER on their turn, can check 'this is my last response'; to which the OTHER can Accept by checking "I accept"; Or by Not Replying within 36 hours;

4. After stating reason(s) checks "I Disagree with the Last Response".

Changing an 'acceptance by not replying in time' to an 'I disagree' must be done during next logon.

Non-Members can not be questioned on the N1CL record about their Q&A dialogues with a Member or Yes/No person; but anyone can question their "Yes/No's".

The N1CL Interface's Best Feature

The Automatic Consequence giving users the Public workload each can handle: Unless your Dialogues are current; the N1CL Interface automatically blocks you from asking or being asked a new question.

Except for 'not replying' to a 'this is my last response'; Staying Current is a reply within 36 hours after your notice e-mail is sent. The block is automatically removed when you become current. Except for larger organizations, you can block new questions at any time by stating a reason; e.g. vacation, sick.

Show Your Honesty To All By Becoming A Member

Question a Member-'No/Yes' person | Apply for Betamembership