[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous
Nickname
Password

[x] Quote of the Day

[x] Main Menu

[x] Coppermine Stats
coppermine
• Albums: 1
• Pictures: 3
  · Views: 1453
  · Votes: 0
  · Comments: 4
04-04-10 How We Measure the General Welfare With We Life Forms Common M

11-20-09 In 1985 I discovered what 'Objective Measure of Personal Value' all life forms use to keep themselves alive. This is the oldest 'economic question of all, "What do we each use to measure what is good and bad for ourselves under all possible sets of physical circumstances?".

02-28-10 Objective Value must take this logical form to measured: 1 unit of x(what we value) per unit time, where time is measured by c, the speed of light. Personal value. after all, depends upon being alive to experience value.

(01-10-10)When it is the same thing for all of we life forms, then we have an "Objective Measure of the General Welfare".



For scientists, this objective measure of value must serve as the premise for a real GUT theory; since a theory is created by one or more of us and explains how things work for all of us, it must begin and end with how we basically organize information, own time cost minimization.

Below I will describe what it is, how we use it, how I discovered what our "measure of personal value is", and some implications.

Right now almost of of us use this measure unconsciously. Unconscious gets you and us dead.

What is this measure of personal value?

Actually it is a measure of personal cost to obtain what we value. It is the same cost measure for all life forms, your time alive, and we all only have one unit of time alive per unit time = 24 hours a day per day to obtain the necessities for life.

Ergo, we try to spend as little time alive as possible to obtain whatever it is we need to stay alive. That's because when we take to long, we die.

We are unconscious "own time cost minimizers".

1-30-2009 The answer to the original First Question on Front Page was; "Why won't our leaders ever ask this question: "How Do Our/my Actions COST OTHERS/you?".

Since we so very visibly live by exchange(XC) = use money; then how our actions costs others time is the the question we must ask in order to to be fair to others and maximize the common good. Yet this question, "How do my actions cost other equal persons their time?", is of course, the one our leaders never ask.

8-12-2008 rev. This "objective" measure of the common good arises directly from my refutation of "Coase's Theorem. 4-22-08 Coase's Theorem, Politics, and Scientific Publication Which led in turn to another implication: how we use this 'objective measure of value" implied what conserved geometry our universe must be based upon for us to be alive = a Moebius Strip Geometry.

"Objective" means we each can confirm that we can perceive this measure with our normal sensory apparatus,i.e. rap it with your knuckles directly or by seeing a 'gauge' move.

The common good means that this "measure of value" must be the same thing for each of us. In short, it must be how you, probably unconsciously now, measure what is good and bad for yourself by comparing the 'time costs to yourself' of alternative courses of action.

1-12-09 Once we agree upon what our in common 'objective personal value measure' is, then that directly implies a public 'moral standard' for judging how anyone's behavior affects the survival of all. Most of us do not like that idea. It impinges on our freedom of action. However, when you live on a planet where our individual actions must affect others for good or ill, then knowing what this Objective Measure of Value is and applying it to our own actions, is absolutely necessary for our planet's survival.

When all life forms(people) use the same measure for personal good and bad,it means we can aggregate and sum up all the individual goods into an objective measure of the common good = an Objective Measure of the General Welfare.

How do I prove this to someone?

Since 1985, I have shown at least 35,000 people what this measure is in person, face to face, plus many hundreds of thousands on the radio. I started doing this after publication of may article on Coase was blocked by an anonymous referee, despite my Professors saying I was right. So I started publishing anyway as the duty of a scientist is to publish after you make a discovery. By 1990, I started to hear my words come back to me over the radio and TV = cost minimization.

So after getting someone to agree that this 'objective, rap it with your knuckles' measure must be the one thing common to everything they do, I would ask; "What is the one thing common to everything you do? Three people out of the 35,000 got it right.

So I would ask, "What do you see when you look in the mirror in the morning?". Usually with a little nudge, they would admit that they saw themselves, their body, their life form. Ergo, your life form is the one objective, rap it with your knuckles, thing common to everything you do.

Next, I would ask, "How many hours a day do you have alive in your body?"
"Why, 24 hours" they would answer.
"How about the bug on the floor if it should live so long"; "The same."
"And the E-T in the Andromeda galaxy?"; "The same."

So then I would ask, "That means you have one unit of time alive per unit time?; "Yes."

Then I would say, "So the real question is, How do we use(spend) our time alive to get what we need to say alive, isn't it?" "Yes."

Then I would whisper in their ear, "We try to use as little time as possible, don't we; because when we take to long, we die." "Yes."

So your own personal objective measure of value is, of course, your life form. A life form is objective, we both can rap it with out knuckles. Your life form is common to everything you do until death. And every life form in the universe has the same amount of time alive per day = 24 Earth hours, if they should live so long.
i.e. One unit of time alive per unit time as measured by the speed of light. Notice I just plugged us into e = mc^ (c^ = c squared).

As we saw above the real question is, "How do we use our time alive to get what we need to stay alive?" The answer was, "As little as possible.". That's because when we take to long to get what we need to keep our life forms alive, we die. ERGO, almost all of you until you read this are UNCONSCIOUS Own Time Cost Minimizers. You all know what staying unconscious gets you. Dead! Wake up, smell the roses, we have a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter coming due. I do know that almost all of you want to stay alive.

8-12-2008 How Did I Figure This Out and What Does It Mean For Doing Science?

The beginning is the best place to start. Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize in Economics in 1991 for asking this simple question in "The Problem of Social Cost" Journal of Law & Economics, October 1960, "Who should society make pay for causing a cost to another person's person or property?" He made clear that each person owned their property 100%. He pointed out that there were two possible ways society could enforce Liability for a cost by anyone upon another's 'property or person'.

It turns out that his question and showing why he was mistaken directly implied what and how this Objective Measure of the Common Good worked. Coase by his assumptions constructed a conserved but growing 'universe' that required, by construction, that you must use a piece of the universe as a fixed measure all other possible variables were compared. As we will see this was a crucial assumption by Coase and explains his wonderful error = 'wrong' prediction.

Coase gave a great example: A Cattleman and Wheat farmer who lived next to each other. The CM cattle trampled or ate some of the farmers wheat. Somebody was going to bear the cost of the lost wheat, the only real question from societies point of view is' "Who do we make pay for causing the cost?". Coase pointed out there were two ways to assign Liability; Strict Liability = CM pays for the damage his cattle causes, OR No Liability = the WF pays the CM not to damage him in the future. Golly, that sounds exactly like the legal definition of extortion.

BUT, when Coase compared the Q of G&S XCed of the two alternative ways of assigning liability, he found there was no difference. Crime had no cost. Our corporations loved his answer. Now they could bribe legislators to change the laws to let them sell Not Hurting People = Not Polluting.

It took me eight years to find his procedural error = an example of the Fallacy of Non-Attribution explained in Why Coase's Theorem is Wrong, Politics, and Scientific Publication.

Once I figured out Coase, I asked "How must we work for this result to be true?"

The most important thing it implied for us right now is: We have a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter that must be dealt with for us to reap the fruits of self-awareness.

Posted by admin Saturday, July 12, 2008 (22:30:30)
[ Administration ]


"04-04-10 How We Measure the General Welfare With We Life Forms Common M" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Related Links [x]

Article Rating [x]
Average Score: 4.7
Votes: 10


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options [x]

Disconnect Links [x]

Seeing Ourselves [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Survey [x]
How should we date entries on site?

Month-day-year e.g. 5(may)-6-2007 = 5-6-2007
50 %50 %50 %
day-month-year = 6-5(may)-2007 = 6-5-2007
41 %41 %41 %
year-month-day= 2007-5(may)-6 = 2007-5-6
8 %8 %8 %
Results :: Polls

Votes: 12
Comments: 0

Forums Last posts [x]

Message Tree [x]
Dan: After posting warning about Macondo to Deeepwater Horizon Hesponse and on Congress.org I received a few hits. As per usual, no questions. There is still the eq to finish. Simultaneous/local ??? The many from one. Remember, it is a loction/navigation w respect to the Bowtie line = both ends simultaneously.
04-Sep-2010 11:33:48
Dan: "Any man who wants to be president is either an egomaniac or crazy." Dwight D. Eisenhower .
31-Aug-2010 05:09:48
Dan: Eq: We locate ourselves between two boundaries with a 'no can go direction' and a preferred direction on or ahead of M surface. M twists back on itself forced by 'no can go direction' = violate conservation. Prefered direction is towards a 'split', a replication by sub-division; but subdivision does not catch what is going on. When a M divides it expands in circuference and surface area. Maybe call the process 'expand by division' while not fiolating conservation with respect to base input.
28-Aug-2010 03:52:16
Dan: "Do we Earthlings deserve to live, deserve to be helped by the E-Ts and thus me?" The answer is of course, a resounding yes. I, you, the E-Ts are duty bound as self life lovers; since we live by XC. I, We just have to ask them to help the right way. So what is the way???? Use the List, that has to be key. Ask, "Will you help us verify that Earth faces a mortal danger?".
27-Aug-2010 05:02:20
Dan: I have spent the last year trying to get out of doing this disconnection with a whole heart like my "we are too bad to live" ala Avatar. We make our future always, that is what staying alive requires. There is always an out, always at least two alternatives, you just have to see the 'split' that creates the alternative, starting with the opposite possibility. Anyway, I can't wiggle off the hook, it is do or die as life always depends on adapting, adjusting, improvising to change the "particular circumstances of time and place" Hayek, in a way that keeps Us alive.
27-Aug-2010 04:44:43
Dan: But we are all copies of God = little Moebiuses, just not big enough or old enough to be self-aware; so is Mother earth self-aware, as we life forms aggregate many independent cells symbiotically?
21-Aug-2010 06:28:08
Dan: [b]Why this well from hell?[/b] Mother Earth is using us to try and kill off over half the biomass on the planet in less than one year beginning July 16, 2011. To use us this way means we are not very conscious of what is really going on.
19-Aug-2010 20:11:42
Dan: New problem w BP well. There is something causing a plug. They are worried about over pressure???? On Drudge. "Final Gulf oil well 'kill' plan on hold amid pressure fears", "WASHINGTON (AFP) – A long-standing deadline for sealing the ruptured Gulf of Mexico well deep below the seabed will be missed as US officials and BP tackle concerns about debris lodged in the well. BP and US government representatives had hoped to complete a "bottom kill" procedure and officially pronounce the well dead by mid-August, but the US pointman on the oil spill response said Monday the bid was on hold. Admiral Thad Allen said that an earlier successful process sealing the well from above may have wedged cement between two layers of casing, trapping leaked crude inside the void.".xxxxx In short, they don't know what is going on. Come on, please give us a plugged well for real.
17-Aug-2010 20:46:26
Dan: Obama is self destructing. a perfect opportunity to show he is for the first amendment and religious freedom and he temporizes. He is an empty suit.
17-Aug-2010 12:45:49
Dan: Why does BP well still leak? Since they expected 9000 psi after capping well, but got 6450 psi rising slowly to 7000 pse; then there are three possibilities. 1. a leak with a grindup from bottom that reduces weight of oil/gas in well bore above intake; 2. no leak, but field pressure is increasing; 3. A leak, but rock formation is gradually sealing itself off implying exponential pressure increase as formation seals off. The second possibility, field pressure increasing gradually seems unlikely in any biotic field, where 2#psi per hour would be fast I would think. Whereas an abiotic field = very very large would be constant implying possibility one = A big leak!!
14-Aug-2010 21:27:47
Message History
Only Registered Users can POST
Create/Login


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent Pending
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit. Before charging above actual standard copying expense,
except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).

Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy