No1stcostlist.com

Dan · Joined: Dec 31, 1969 Posts: 208 Location: USA

The date shown by the positions of the 65 asteroids in the Missing Earth(ME) crop circle is July 16, 2009 at 16:32 UTC or exactly three sidereal Earth years later on July 16, 2102.
This is confirmed by the position of the first conjunction shown in the ME. It lies on the 9 o'clock axis of our North heliocentric coordinate system.

It seemed obvious that the circles representing each asteroid would vary directly with there actual diameters.

But, the circles representing the 65 asteroid's actual diameters did not match their actual diameters, with few exceptions. A big discrepancy??? The clue was Thisbe, its circle was bigger than it should be.

As you see in the ME, the 65 asteroids are all on the same orbit. In reality their orbital radii may vary by hundreds of millions of kilometers from inside Mar's orbit to outside Jupiter's.

The E-Ts had a problem, how to show each asteroids actual orbital radius and diameter while keeping crop circle size manageable; plus unmistakably, and oh so elegantly, show active intelligence at work.

Solution:

1. They assigned a circle representing each asteroid that is proportional to its actual diameter, then;

2. they varied the size of the circle representing each asteroid's diameter by the percentage that its actual orbital radius was of the mean of the 65 asteroids orbital radii;

3. they placed the modified circles representing each of the 65 asteroids on the mean of their orbital radii.

The E-Ts used this formula to vary size of circle representing each asteroid.

diameter of circle assigned to each asteroid
---------------------------------------------------------
divided by each asteroids percentage of orbital mean of the 65 asteroids.

The result:

When an asteroids orbital radius is less than the mean; then the circle representing it would be made larger;

when its orbital radius is greater than the mean; then the circle representing it would be made smaller.

i.e. smaller orbital radius = larger circle; while a larger orbital radius = smaller circle.

e.g. 100 km diameter/80% of mean = circle in ME increased to 125% of its assigned size.

e.g. 100 km diameter/125% of mean = circle assigned in ME decreased to 80%.

What a unique way to show us four variables with one circle that uniquely identify each asteroid.

1. Orbital position on a given time/date.

2. Actual diameter.

3. Orbital radius.

4. Which 65 asteroids are shown in the Missing Earth circle from out of the hundreds of thousands of asteroids. By inspection, any particular group of 65 asteroids would have a unique mean for their orbital radii.

That is slick! In "Geometric Harvest" Science News February 1, 1992, Gerard Hawkins, a marvelous geometrician, demonstrated that some of the early crop circles were proofs of geometric theorems that had never before been published on Earth in ancient or modern mathematical literature. The Barbary Castle was one of those proofs. It was pictured on the SN cover. Once I recognized it was a picture of my original prediction that Earth had a conservation debt made of Anti-Matter, it led to following conclusion, among the others on this site.

I will bet a $1000 that this simple graphical method of showing four objective asteroid variables has never been done on Earth before either. All you have to do is show us on the N1CL a "previous to now" published use of this method to represent a given group of asteroid's positions, orbital radius, diameter, and mean of their orbits for a given date/time. Any takers?
_________________