[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Security CodeSecurity Code
Type Code

[x] Main Menu

Q&A Instructions

1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue into Question & Answer Dialogue forum; then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.

2. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.

3. Remember you take turns, checking an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

4. Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.

Finally, to open another popup, close the old one.


The 65 ME Asteroids orbital radius and diameter calculator
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index n1cl-1 Dan Alter's forum

Author Message
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 314
Location: USA

PostPost subject: The 65 ME Asteroids orbital radius and diameter calculator
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:19 pm

1-15-17 Revised and clarified. Actually minor changes. Not bad for over seven years from first posting.

I predict the date shown by the positions of the 65 asteroids in the Missing Earth(ME) crop circle is July 16, 2024 at mm:ss UTC, 26 minutes and about four seconds before The ray from the Sun strikes Earth at 10:47:35 UTC AM.

At first I thought it was July 16, 2009 because the Conjunction lies on the 9 o'clock axis of our North heliocentric coordinate system, but that date was wrong. The E-Ts used base 7 = 21 years from the "start counting from date" = July 17, 2003, exactly 12 sidereal years after the Barbary Castle circle was placed down. What a relief from six years to 33. Boy wrong predictions can be nice sometimes.

It seemed obvious that the circles representing each asteroid would vary directly with their actual diameters,
but, the circles representing the 65 asteroid's actual diameters did not seem to match their actual diameters, with few exceptions. A big discrepancy??? The clue was Thisbe, its circle was bigger than it should be.

As you see in the ME, the 65 asteroids are all on the same orbit. In reality their orbital radii may vary by hundreds of millions of kilometers from inside Mar's orbit to outside Jupiter's.

The E-Ts had a problem, how to show each asteroids actual orbital radius and diameter while keeping crop circle size manageable; plus unmistakably, and oh so elegantly, show active intelligence at work.

Solution:

1. They assigned a circle representing each asteroid that is proportional to its actual diameter, then;

2. they varied the size of the circle representing each asteroid's diameter by the percentage that its actual orbital radius was from the mean of the 65 asteroids orbital radii;

3. they placed the modified circles representing each of the 65 asteroids on the mean of the 65 orbital radii;

4. The E-Ts used this formula to vary size of circle representing each asteroid;

diameter of circle assigned to each asteroid by its actual diameter.
--------------------------------------------------------------
divided by each asteroids percentage of orbital mean of the 65 asteroids.

The result:

When an asteroids orbital radius is less than the mean; then the circle representing it would be made larger;

when its orbital radius is greater than the mean; then the circle representing it would be made smaller.

i.e. smaller orbital radius = larger circle; while a larger orbital radius = smaller circle.

e.g. 100 km diameter/80% of mean = circle in ME increased to 125% of its assigned size.

e.g. 100 km diameter/125% of mean = circle assigned in ME decreased to 80%.

What a unique way to show us four variables with one circle that uniquely identify each asteroid as a member of this group of 65 asteroids.

1. Actual Orbital position on a given time/date.

2. Actual diameter.

3. Actual orbital radius.

4. Actual member of the 65 asteroids shown in the Missing Earth circle by showing its orbital radius is included in the computation of the "orbital mean" of the 65 shown.

There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids; by inspection, any particular group of 65 asteroids would have a unique mean for their groups' orbital radii.

Our astronomers can determine which two are in conjunction and all 65 members quickly within days with some want to.

That is slick! In "Geometric Harvest" Science News, February 1, 1992 Gerard Hawkins a world famous geometrician, demonstrates that some of the early crop circles were proofs of geometric theorems that had never before been published on Earth in ancient or modern mathematical literature.

The Barbary Castle crop circle shown on the Science News cover was one of Hawkins' geometric proofs. Once I recognized it was a picture of my original prediction of how Earth would be vaporized by our conservation debt made of Anti-Matter, it led to the following

four conclusions:

1. Only someones who had seen these living planet vaporizations from close by could have drawn such a picture = no one from Earth = E-Ts;

2. It had a date, either six or seven units of time from I assumed the date/time it was placed down = July 17, 1991 at 1:35 UT.

3. It took me three days of thinking to deduce we could prevent it; then I started waving my arms.

4. Good thing the start from counting date was July 17, 2003 and the unit of time was three Earth years as you will learn.

I strongly doubt if this simple graphical method of showing four objective asteroid variables has ever been done on Earth before either. All you have to do is show us on the N1CL a "previous to now" published use of this method to represent a given group of asteroid's positions, orbital radius, diameter, and mean of the group's orbits for a given date/time. Any takers? A prize will be given.

_________________

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index n1cl-1 Dan Alter's forum
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Seeing Ourselves [x]

Forums Last posts [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]
This URL is for those of you who deny the E-Ts existence.

Disclosure Project has 500 govt witnesses who swore before Congress to their direct E-T contacts.

This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.

Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.

Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program

Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?

Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.

These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.

How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024?

9-21-12 How to find the 2 conjunction asteroids in the "Missing Earth" crop circle?


This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.


Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center

Crop Circle Connector


2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's

HOW can we get these tests DONE?

Contact Congress

The Latest Changes Made To Site




Visitors [x]
We have received
7221080
page views since
April 27, 2005


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent# 8566730 issued 10/22/2013
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit.
When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy
includes/cmsinit.inc