[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

[x] Main Menu

[x] Coppermine Stats
coppermine
 Albums: 1
 Pictures: 3
  · Views: 1304
  · Votes: 0
  · Comments: 4

Diff Between Forums

1. The "open to all who register" Community Forums and the Questions for Members, etc forums(Q&A Dialogues) are separate forums.

2. In the public Community Forums you do not have to answer questions, you can use an anonymous handle, and start any topic you like..

3. We will not divulge your e-mail address.

4. To be notified of replies in "open to all who register" Community Forums, click on "watch this topic" below topic entry box when you make your first entry.

5. We do not screen posts, but we do have a foul language filter. Upon repeated complaints of threatening or illegal language, we will ban you, as per registration agreement. Remember courtesy is a big public virtue.


How full member Q&A forums treat both questioner and Member-Yes/No persons impartially.

Q&A how to use.
1. Copy what your question is about from the Member or Yes/No forums or any Member Q&A Dialogue.

2. Then go to Q&A forum to question a Member or Yes/No person by clicking this link: then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.

A glitch, after clicking on link above, you will same Q&A and Diff blocks. Don't worry, you did go to Q&A. Look below to see "Questions for Members and Yes/No persons" header and the "New Topic" button.

Our forums module treats Q&A forums and Community forums the same, so I can not get rid of the 'howto' blocks in Q&A forum YET so at first it looks like you did not go anywhere. Fix coming.


3. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 in "New Topic" Subject box followed by subject of question.

4. In Q&A Dialogues the "notification box" is automatically checked.

5. Remember, an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.



Why restore Bankqruptcy Laws back to pre 2006 form in USA

Author Message
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 208
Location: USA

PostPost subject: Why restore Bankqruptcy Laws back to pre 2006 form in USA
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:46 pm
Reply with quote

It is no accident that 'forgiving debts' every seven years is found in the bible. Lenders like earning interest without physical work, and borrowers like spending investing the money.

The problem is that both borrowers and lenders over estimate the borrowers ability to pay the money back.

The result of non-repayable debts is that borrowers wind up in a form of Debtors Prison without the ability to go bankrupt, and lenders wind up with many fewer people to loan to. The effect on the general economy is catastrophic as future growth can not occur. The borrower can not get a fresh start, and the lenders become like 'Shylocks'.

It is not an accident that a big percentage of successful businesses are started by former bankrupts. Their founders needed the lessons taught by bankruptcy.

But it is the discipline upon lenders of bankruptcy that is most important. They had the money last, without a real bankruptcy law, lenders become much less careful to whom they lend their money to.

Our lenders money is in a real sense our money, our savings. A banker is lending OPM, "other peoples money", so just like opium clouds your judgment of consequences, when the ability of borrowers to go bankrupt is restricted, bankers start ignoring the ability of the borrower to repay.

One major cause of the 2006 so called bankruptcy reform that restricted bankruptcy, is the present financial mess we now see ourselves in.

Contact your elected representative now and demand a return to the former bankruptcy law. Make sure there are no exemptions for some rich peoples assets.

Upon the return or real bankruptcy, then the borrowers start over and many start new businesses or can now buy houses etc; and above all, the lender learns to be more careful in the future. The result, our economy can begin to grow again.

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 208
Location: USA

PostPost subject: CEOS of Automakers begging with no plan
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:14 pm
Reply with quote

The sight of the CEOs of our big three automakers testifying, begging for money, and not having a plan for investing it is amazing.

They fly in on three separate private jets.

No "We will sell our private jets and use conference software, or fly commercial."

No "We will take 80% pay cuts."

No "We will eliminate 12 of their 14 layers of executives."

No "We need single payer universal health care to get Health Care costs off our backs and every other businesses back."

No "We have a plan to convert all our cars to flex fuels starting immediately. Cost well under $500 a car when done at factory. Could be done in less than a year = now."

No by GM, "We will bring back electric car we built and then bought back, despite enormous demand."

In short, they only think about their personal gain. They are completely blind to the needs of their company, workers, or their country. True members of a Three Monkey Society leadership. They personify blind personal greed and ambition.

We need a complete reform of "business bankruptcy' laws now.
Workers and American ownership must come first.

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Forums Last posts [x]

Seeing Ourselves [x]

Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]

Survey [x]
How should we date entries on site?

Month-day-year e.g. 5(may)-6-2007 = 5-6-2007
50 %50 %50 %
day-month-year = 6-5(may)-2007 = 6-5-2007
41 %41 %41 %
year-month-day= 2007-5(may)-6 = 2007-5-6
8 %8 %8 %
Results :: Polls

Votes: 12
Comments: 0


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent Pending
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit. Before charging above actual standard copying expense,
except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).

Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy