[x] User Info
Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password
Security CodeSecurity Code
Type Code

[x] Main Menu

Q&A Instructions

1. Copy-n-paste what your question is about from the Member's forum, someones Yes/No forum, or any Member Q&A Dialogue into Question & Answer Dialogue forum; then hit New Topic button and paste your copy in the New Topic box.

2. Put members nicl-(x) number, e.g. nicl-1 or Yes/No persons name in Subject rectangle followed by the subject of question. For a long question, add more at top of Topic box.

3. Remember you take turns, checking an "I agree" or a "this is my last response" ends your part in the dialogue, and the other person gets the last word.

4. Finally, read and reread the Q&A procedures. They are meant to treat both sides of a Dialogue impartially.

Finally, to open another popup, close the old one.


HR3808 Notarization bill would gut eyewitness notariztions
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index Politics

Author Message
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 319
Location: USA
PostPost subject: HR3808 Notarization bill would gut eyewitness notariztions
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:12 pm

At first reading of Notarization bill House Bill 3808, the assertions it would let banks off the hook seemed absurd, complete hogwash. It seemed obvious it needed to be done a long time ago.

But in practice it would pardon false notarization's etc. because instead of having a strong eye witness notarization requirement, it allowed the weakest state notarization to be used. In short whatever the banks could bribe a state legislature to pass. As Karl Denninger was right to point out. "Once this law is passed they will find some state that needs jobs, and bribe the legislature to enact ridiculously loose notary laws, such that a notary signature will become effectively meaningless.

This law will force every other State in the Union to accept that signature even though it signifies nothing.

Notarization is an extremely important legal protection. It provides verification that the person who is alleged to have signed a document in "wet ink" actually did so, and actually made a personal appearance and signed in front of the Notary.

Further, land titles and land transactions, along with the private property rights that vest thereupon, are inherently a state function, and their protection and verification is also a state function."

Denninger is right so the bill must vetoed until it is fixed.

Relevant section here. SEC. 3. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN STATE COURTS.

Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a State shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a State other than the State where the court is located if--

(1) such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce; and

(2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or

(B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record so as to render the record tamper-resistant.

Note it says "lawful notarization's", but here is the clue, it does not define what is a lawful notarization.

Instead of creating a good electronic record of the paperwork of a real notarized transaction, it opens the doors for banks to completely evade really signing contracts. It short it will enable fraud as sure as the Sun rises in the East.

We need as real across state lines notarization bill with full specified eyewitness verified Notarization procedures.

HR 3808

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."


Last edited by Dan on Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:34 pm; edited 2 times in total

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dan
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 31, 1969
Posts: 319
Location: USA
PostPost subject: Re: Fix HR3808 Notarization bill.
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:00 am

I included this section in above for good reason. Denninger is right> I did not realize the implications of such a simple bill without a good definition of eyewitness notarization's.

"As long as a strong eye witness notarization requirement is included. Karl Denninger was right to point out. "Once this law is passed they will find some state that needs jobs, and bribe the legislature to enact ridiculously loose notary laws, such that a notary signature will become effectively meaningless.

This law will force every other State in the Union to accept that signature even though it signifies nothing.

Notarization is an extremely important legal protection. It provides verification that the person who is alleged to have signed a document in "wet ink" actually did so, and actually made a personal appearance in front of the Notary.

Further, land titles and land transactions, along with the private property rights that vest thereupon, are inherently a state function, and their protection and verification is also a state function."

Denninger is right so the bill must vetoed until it is fixed."

_________________
"I swear to speak honestly and seek the truth when I use the No 1st Cost List public record."

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index Politics
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Seeing Ourselves [x]

Forums Last posts [x]
Last 10 Forum Messages

ToDos for WOUs
Last post by Dan in To Dos suggested for N1CL on Oct 05, 2017 at 05:25:21

new thered checking
Last post by in Warnings To Public on Dec 31, 1969 at 20:00:00

Radiation levels in US rising fast, 2-1-13 latest.
Last post by amir.bukhari in Warnings To Public on Sep 05, 2017 at 13:47:59

Alex Animal testing should stop
Last post by SystemBot in Warnings To Public on Aug 29, 2017 at 09:31:16

Weat Family Auto in Kent WA, Kudos!!!
Last post by amir.bukhari in Reccomendations To All on Aug 28, 2017 at 11:23:45

pollution on the earth
Last post by Dan in Advertizer forum for non Full Members and Members on Aug 23, 2017 at 06:27:48

Sun exploding nicl-amir.bukhari
Last post by Dan in Advertizer forum for non Full Members and Members on Aug 23, 2017 at 06:17:18

The most recent and relevant urls.
Last post by Dan in n1cl-1 Dan Alter's forum on Aug 22, 2017 at 20:08:27

A ToE that uses Gravity to link the other three basic forces
Last post by amir.bukhari in n1cl-1 Dan Alter's forum on Aug 16, 2017 at 07:53:28

economy of the world
Last post by amir.bukhari in Politics on Jul 26, 2017 at 09:51:46


Latest Articles [x]

Disconnect Links [x]
This URL is for those of you who deny the E-Ts existence.

Disclosure Project has 500 govt witnesses who swore before Congress to their direct E-T contacts.

This climate url speaks to how corrupt much of our scientific establishment has become.

Why rising CO2 levels Can NOT cause global warming.

Cimate Fraud Whistleblower Rewards Program

Why is handling the massive scientific disagreement with the AGW(Anthropogenic Global Warming = (man caused) proponents crucial to disconnecting Earth's Anti-Matter debt?

Our leaders and thus most of you will not seek the truth about our real place in the universe. Why is explained by ignorance and self service. Until our society openly deals with this easy to resolve scientific disagreement, I must conclude we will not act to prevent Earth from being vaporized.

These links deal directly with How to Prevent our Sun from exploding.

How do we prevent our Sun from exploding July 16, 2024?

9-21-12 How to find the 2 conjunction asteroids in the "Missing Earth" crop circle?


This math is required.
How to use a circle to relate 'e' to Phi.


Confirming objective reports.
National UFO Reporting Center

Crop Circle Connector


2-4-2017 Needed A-M debt Disconnection Tools, Measurements & Must Do's

HOW can we get these tests DONE?

Contact Congress

The Latest Changes Made To Site




Visitors [x]
We have received
7788407
page views since
April 27, 2005


COPYRIGHT 2005 No 1st Cost List, Patent# 8566730 issued 10/22/2013
The logos and trademarks used on this site are the property of their respective owners.
We are not responsible for any information and comments posted by our users, as they are the property of the poster.
Unless you charge above actual copying expense, you may read, copy, reprint, incorporate or pass on to others in any form the material put on the
No 1st Cost List public record for public and private benefit.
When charging above actual copying expenses, except for accepted 'fair use', you must arrange terms of compensation with the author(s).
Interactive software released under GNU GPL, Code Credits, Privacy Policy
includes/cmsinit.incincludes/classes/template.php(92) : eval()'d code