No1stcostlist.com

Dan · Joined: Dec 31, 1969 Posts: 208 Location: USA

The strange denial by present scientists that, "How does the observer = the scientist, hook into their own theories?", is even a question. One of the most fascinating aspects of my conversations with academic physicists is their steadfast denial that they are, by inspection, the one common part of whatever they report or theorize about.

Since Heisenberg and Godel addressed the results of not doing so directly; respectively 'the minimal range of 'error' in measured observations' and 'the limits of logical assertions about reality'; this practiced denial of present physicists is truly stupefying. Three Monkey Societies are so wonderful.

e.g. I say, "I can show you the Geometry that by inspection explains where the Anti-Matter and missing matter and energy are that your present theories can not explain. Can I show you?" All I ever get is an instantaneous change of subject, and when pushed they snarl like cornered rabbits. I don't think they realize that not saying, "Show me!", means they can not possibly be real scientists.

Until we figure out how scientists, the 'makers' of all "Scientific Theories" fit objectively into all theories logical basis; we must wind up with physics theories that can not explain where any of the A-M is that their own theories require to exist, nor where over 90% plus of all matter and energy are in the universe.

Instead of consciously looking for 'logical and observational discrepancies' to their theories; present scientists only see what is in their 'unconscious' pecking order based self interest. This is demonstrated by their refusal to answer 'Questions from Anyone"; especially those questions and assertions that would overturn their advocated theory. This refusal to answer is a sure road to error and direct evidence of pseudo science.

In conclusion, it is true by inspection that until we answer this question, "How does the Maker of any Theory hook into their theories?"; we can not achieve an accurate picture of how our universe works. Which means that our present "no answer questions from anyone academic scientists(?)" and the human race can not objectively see and explain how reality works.

The remedy is simple; a No 1st Cost List. We invented the N1CL so I or anyone else who claims to be a scientist, could answer anyone's demand of "Show me!" or 'How do you explain this discrepancy?", in public. Since science is for all, answering in public to anyone is the only honest way scientists can answer questions and challenges to their assertions. It must work that way by definition.

For example, using the N1CL is the only way to test my assertion that I have discovered 'The objective causal premise for all scientific theories created by human beings.' = my article Biggest Scientific Discovrey Since Soft Ice Cream. Lets play some show & tell.

Dan Alter